B l o g g i n g   F o r   M i c h i g a n
Mobile Edition



Subscribe to our newsletter

Preview




S O L I D A R I T Y




BFM Video


President Obama Weekly Address: 3/13/2010


LG Chem Battery Plant Announces Location in Holland


Rep. Schauer on the Recovery Act Bringing Toda Jobs to Battle Creek


Pure Michigan- "Sunrise"


C3 - "Spirit in Action: You Cant Cross the Sea by Staring at the Water"

BFM YouTube Channel






BFM Hits   Granholm    Schauer    Bishop    Dillon    Economy    Senate Dems    Search BFM


Allowing 16-Year Olds to Vote

by: Mickey Switalski

Mon May 12, 2008 at 11:59:36 AM EDT


(Welcome Senator Switalski! - promoted by wizardkitten)

Last Wednesday, I introduced legislation (Senate Joint Resolution N) that would allow 16-year old students to vote in local school board elections. Under this constitutional amendment, students would be unable to vote in school millage or bond elections. In order for it to become law, the measure requires a two-thirds majority of the Michigan Senate and House and voters must approve in the November election. Before you attempt to have me committed to a mental institution, here me out. I have reprinted my speech made on the Senate floor explaining the reasoning behind this legislation.

(Senate Journal, May 7, 2008) My statement is as follows:

"I have a truly radical and wild-eyed idea today that I want to propose. Yesterday was an election day in many areas of the state. Election Day should be the secular equivalent of a high holy day in Michigan. It should be a day when we celebrate democracy by exercising our most cherished right, the right to vote.

Unfortunately, many school board candidates were elected yesterday despite less than 10 percent of the electorate casting ballots. Today, I have introduced a constitutional amendment that would make a radical change to voter eligibility and significantly raise the level of participation in such elections. I propose that we grant 16-year-olds the right to vote in school board elections. We have legislation pending that would allow the Secretary of State to pre-register teens to vote when they get their provisional drivers' license at age 16. I support this legislation; it will result in more teens registering to vote.

Mickey Switalski :: Allowing 16-Year Olds to Vote
But we can go even further. We should duplicate the success of the graduated driver's license program, which allows teen to drive earlier at 14 years and 9 months, but with significant restrictions. After a two-year apprenticeship, they are then allowed to drive unrestricted. This training period has resulted in more responsible teen drivers who are involved in fewer accidents.

This constitutional amendment would apply that same principle of apprenticeship to voters. If we just pre-register them and make them wait two years, they will forget that they even registered. Let's allow them to vote for school board candidates and begin the habit of a lifetime. They will cast their ballots and participate in civic affairs and our democracy will be stronger for it. Students are directly and immediately affected by these elections. They care about having good schools. Who knows more about how our schools are operating than the students themselves? They should have some say in the governance of the system.

It will also be a good tonic for the rest of the electorate. Statistics show that turnout is routinely below 10 percent in these elections. More adults would vote if they knew their kids could outvote them. Some parents would be shamed into voting when they drove their kid to the polls. Others would finally appreciate the value and power of the ballot.

I recently received about 60 letters from Heather Schodowski's students at Dresden Elementary in Sterling Heights. While some students asked me to pass laws to create new video games or reduce the price of LEGO or even the chewing of gum, two students, Keegan McMillan and Jennifer Amodeo, asked me to allow young people to vote. I think their suggestion has merit, and I propose that 16-year-olds, mostly juniors and seniors in high school, be allowed to vote for school board candidates, but not for millages or bond issues or for any other elections. Nor would my amendment lower the current age required to run for various offices, but it will engage and train a new generation of voters."  

Tags: , , , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email
I love this idea (4.00 / 2)
For all the reasons you mention. It will get more people paying attention to local elections, it will get kids involved in the process and help them develop the habit of civic involvement. If we let them drive around two-ton vehicles, we certainly can extend the responsibility and trust we already allow and let them vote in elections that concern them!

Thanks for this bill - and thanks also for all the number crunching you do on budget issues. You have been the voice of sanity for fiscal responsibility in the Senate!

Keep up the good work!


16 year olds voting (0.00 / 0)
Senator I am one of those School Board members that got elected last Tuesday and I do wish that there was more voter interest in their community schools. However, allowing 16 year olds to vote for School Board candidates would not work. I am sorry but they are just not ready. Many of them would vote for candidates who promise to abolish dress codes, get rid of "hard" teachers who make them study and do their homework, a lowering of academic standards, longer lunch hours, shorter school days, sweets, candy,pop, and everything not healthy for youngsters in the cafeteria, a smoking area for students, and even abolishment of the 'drug free zone' concept in school areas. It just won't work, I wish I could believe that 16 year olds have the maturity to vote for what is best for them, but they often don't. I am in a small district in the U.P. , (Engadine) so the students could very well out vote an apathetic voting public and even elect an inexperienced Board of 18 year olds still in or just out of school.

Sorry, I am a Democrat and a Progressive but as a parent and a School Board member, I can't go with you on this one.


Disagree (4.00 / 1)
Young people are not more likely to vote for candidates based on the criteria you just outlined, Jim, than adults are likely to vote for candidates based on "name recognition" and "who you feel you can have a beer with".

We can not use an arbitrary maturity test as a criteria for allowing people the right to vote. Young people are just as - if not more - invested in who is elected to their school board as older people are. Who knows, we may even start to get candidates in office who are actually willing to put children first.

I absolutely love this idea!

"Can't think of a witty comment right now."


[ Parent ]
Yep (4.00 / 1)
I tend to agree with Yvette. I was a jr/sr high youth group leader for more than a decade and I found that young people rose to the occasion and acted with maturity when it came to something serious. In fact, they appreciated being put in a position where they were trusted to "act like adults."

This is a good way to transition this age group into adulthood. If we can send them to fight in Iraq at 18, then we should trust them to vote for their school board.  


[ Parent ]
16 v 18 (0.00 / 0)
There is a big maturity gap from 16 to 18. We aren't talking about going to Iraq at 18 , we are talking about preparing them for college and the world with their high school education.Children at this age need guidance and direction and leadership. To do something like this would be to shirk our duties as adults.  

[ Parent ]
Criteria for election (0.00 / 0)
Yes, name recognition is important at all levels of the election process. Unfortuneatelty some adults do vote for some candidates based on who they would like to have a beer with. Normally that is not a factor in school board elections. Adding 16 year olds to the mix of poor voter turnout and poorly informed voters would only add to the dysfunction.

I don't know what teenagers you are in contact with, the teenagers I know definetly do care about things like having to pull their pants up their waist. It is quite conceivable that a school Board Candidate could get elected based on a platform of getting rid of dress codes that mandate that students have to pull their pants up. We will have rear ends and underwear exposed all over the school.No one is going to be studying because they are checking out somebody's polka dotted underwear. Another hot issue with students, cell phones. They want complete access to their cell phones. Kids would be sitting in math class talking on the cells because they supported , en masse,a school board candidate who campaigned on getting rid of the cell phone ban.

This is absolutely a terrible and possibly very destructive idea that could waste millions and millions of tax payers dollars and jepordize our children's future.  


[ Parent ]
Hypothesizing (0.00 / 0)
On the surface, your logic sounds valid, but you are hypothesizing. There is no way of knowing for sure what 16 year olds would do with the right to vote until you actually let them do it.

Denying people the right to vote based on fear of what they would do with it has been declared unconstitutional for women, blacks, poor whites, and in some instances, people with criminal histories.

I prefer to try to instill values in our youth, trust them with limited responsibility and watch them rise to the occasion.

"Can't think of a witty comment right now."


[ Parent ]
Let them Grow Up (0.00 / 0)
Let out children grow up and be kids while they are kids. From putting make up on them on them at 10 years of age to leaving them home and on the street by themselves while Daddy works 80 hours a week and Mommy works 50, we have did a disservice to our children.

On a Progressive web site like this, you are going to get lots of sympathy comparing giving the vote to 16 year olds to giving the vote in the past to women, minorities, etc.
Iit is not a valid comparison. The women and minorities in question were full fledged grown up adults.

Why don't we adults start doing our job by being well informed voters who show up at the polls with an intelligent well formed opinion on election day.

I think the Senator's time would be better served presenting bills that have a day off for workers on election days, public financing of forums for candidates and better voter education.


[ Parent ]
Transition (0.00 / 0)
Jim, you have made some valid points, but 16-and-17-year old students are at a transitional period in their lives. We license them to drive cars, give them permission to hold down jobs where they handle money and have responsibilities, and we expect them to start thinking about their adult futures in terms of college, careers, etc. I think giving them a voice in their school board elections is a logical step in helping them think link adults, i.e, what kind of person would be suitable for that position and why, and what does the job entail.  

On the other hand, your concerns about the rural areas are valid.  I don't know what the demographics are like in your area, but if you have a high school with 300 students and half of them are 16-17 years old, do you think they'd be in the majority at the polls and really have the numbers to elect a  "stoner" friend?  Also, it would take several student choices winning those seats to really have any effect on the board, wouldn't it? I mean the board majority still has a vote, and I would assume that majority would be adults voted in by an adult majority.



[ Parent ]
Numbers in rural Communities (4.00 / 1)
Yes, the numbers are such in rural communities that a student poulation could definetly swing an election. It wouldn't just an exercise in learning how to vote, in an election with a poor turnout such as the last one, they could be electing the Board.The winners in our last election got about 190 votes. I am guessing there are 150 kids in our High School and 75 or so would be 16 and above, definetly enough to swing an election with such small numbers.

[ Parent ]
I like the idea (4.00 / 1)
But I too share Jim's concerns about the integrity of the student vote.  (If I can sum up his concerns that way)

Though my specific concern was not that they'd vote for the cool person over the responsible one ... I was concerned that the students might be subject to some kind of duress or unfair "campaigning" while in school.  

The students don't have a choice but to be in the school environment, so that environment would have to have pretty strict protections in place, about not allowing teachers & coaches to tell kids who to vote for.  And then, who would enforce the standards?

But I like the idea of giving kids some participation level ... I just don't know what.  (typical of me)




If you're not interested in what a sit-downer has to say, it's going to take him twice as long to say it. ~my grandpa


Good point (4.00 / 1)
They are a captive audience, and that does make a difference.

[ Parent ]
Local Stoner (0.00 / 0)
Duress could be a problem but I would still be more worried about them voting for the local stoner that promised anarchy.

I like Christine's idea of more student participation though. I just don't want them electing the Board. The student vote might be a drop in the pocket in urban downstate areas but in rural areas they would vote in their own board.


[ Parent ]
I forgot to say, (4.00 / 2)
Welcome!  And thanks for the post!



If you're not interested in what a sit-downer has to say, it's going to take him twice as long to say it. ~my grandpa




BFM Welcome Center
Your BFM Menu:

Make a New Account

Username:

Password:



Forget your username or password?

- About/Contact BFM
- BFM Privacy Policy
- Contribute To BFM

BFM To Go:
 - RSS Diaries and Blasts
 - RSS Recent Comments
 - BFM Newsletter
 - BFM on Twitter
 - BFM on Facebook
 - BFM on iTunes




BFM was Censored by Mike Bishop Aug 2-7, 2007

Twitter Michigan
- Governor Granholm
- Lt Gov Cherry
- Michigan Dems
- Progress Michigan
- Blogging For Michigan

For a more complete list, see our Twitter Michigan directory

BFM Clicklist
· A2Politico
· Absolute Michigan
· ACLU of Michigan
· A Jared Manifesto
· Arbor Update
· Christine Barry
· Blue November
· Center For Michigan
· Conservative Media
· DailyKos Michigan
· The Deaf Edge
· Democracy for Metro Detroit
· East Michigan Blue
· Eclectablog
· Far Left Field
· Great Lakes, Great Times, Great Scott
· Ironicus Maximus
· Liberal, Loud and Proud
· Mark Maynard
· MI Blog
· Michigan in Pictures
· Michigan Liberal
· Michigan Positive
· Motor City Liberal
· My Michigan Connection
· Opinion Artillery
· Our Michigan
· PhiKapBlog
· Positive Detroit
· Powers Court
· Reading For Leading
· Stone Soup Musings
· West Michigan Politics
· West Michigan Rising
· Wizardkitten
· Working in Bare Feet
· YAF Watch

Blogging in Color
· African American Political Pundit
· AfroSpear
· Angry Black B-
· Blabbeando
· Blac (K) Ademic
· Black Commentator
· Culture Kitchen
· Debra Dickerson
· Electronic Village
· Francis L Holland
· Jack and Jill Politics
· Jasmyne Cannick
· Keith Boykin
· La Shawn Barber
· Latino Politico
· Miss Wild Thing
· Oliver Willis
· Prometheus 6
· The Field Negro
· The Republic of T
· Rod 2.0 Beta
· The SuperSpade
· The Whichota NAACP Blog
· TransGriot

This list shamelessly jacked from PHB

Congressional Watchblogs
· The Audacity of Hoek
· Eye On Ehlers
· The Real Dave Camp
· Walberg Watch
· Mr. Rogers' Neighborhood
· Vote No on Joe
· Mad at Thad
· The McCotter Monitor

The Establishment
· Call of the Senate Democrats
· US Congressman John Conyers
· Governor Jennifer Granholm
· Michigan House Democrats
· Michigan Senate Democrats

Environment & Energy
· Black Bear Speaks
· [con]serving Michigan - MI League of Conservation Voters
· Dave Dempsey - Great Lakes Blogger
· Earthanet
· Ecology Center
· Greenflight EV
· Green Machines Tour
· Healthy Car
· Lead Free Wheels
· MI Network for Children's Environmental Health
· Network Green
· Save The Wild UP

Faith and Spirituality
· Pastor John
· St. John's United Church of Christ
· Pastor John's Sermons on Streaming Video
· Christ Community Church
· Aussie Heretic
· iAllison
· Cross Left
· Street Prophets
· United Church of Christ
· Sojourners - Christians for Justice and Peace

Financial and Economic Policy
· Lois Gibbons
· Harmony Financial Network
· Michigan Jump Start Coalition
· Michigan Jump Start Blog
· National Jump Start Coalition
· Michigan Credit Union League
· Michigan NSO

LGBT Community
Blogs

· Bloggin.Out
· Mostly Sunny with a Chance of Gay
· Rainbow Mittens
· The Political Spectrum
Organizations

· Lansing Association for Human Rights
· Michigan Equality
· Michigan Equality MI Idea Blog
· Michigan Pride
· PFLAG - Lansing
· Pride Source
· TransGender Michigan
· Triangle Foundation

Michigan Political Parties
The Democratic Party

· Michigan Democratic Party
· MI Blue Tiger Democrats
· County Parties
· Caucuses
· Congressional District Committees
· Benzie Dems
· Blue Chips (CMU Dems)
· Clare County Democratic Party
· Genessee County Young Dems
· Grosse Pointe Dems
· Isabella County Dems
· Kicking Ass (UM Dems)
· Living Blue (Liv Co Dems)
· Saginaw County Dems
· WMU College Dems

The Green Party

· Michigan Green Party
· Detroit Green Party
· Flint Greens
· Huron Valley Greens
· Ypsilanti Greens
· All MI Green Party Organizations

Other Minor Parties

· Libertarian Party of MI
· Socialist Party of MI
· Independence Party of MI

All content copyright Blogging For Michigan, 2007
All rights reserved unless otherwise specified.

Powered by: SoapBlox